1) Did reading chapter 1 arouse any emotions for your? Common emotions during critical explorations of race include anger, frustration, guilt, discomfort, and confusion. If you had a strong emotional response to a certain aspect of the chapter, identify the part of the chapter, describe the emotion that was aroused, and evaluate this experience. If you did not have any emotional responses to any material in the chapter, explore that.
Reading chapter 1 aroused emotions of validation. A quote
from Ewen and Ewen from Typecasting
emphasized the power of the nobility of the church at a time in our history
when the Catholic Church reigned supreme. They also go on to say “The monopoly
over the Word, over literacy, and over the ability to interpret what was read,
was a fundamental aspect of rule.” This resounded with me because it
illustrated the importance of education and how the powerful elite subjugated
their followers by making them ignorant. Without formal education for all
people, the elite used the word to control and exploit those who were never
taught how to read. This notion of education being only for the privilege harks
back to the days of slavery, where slaves had to run and hide just so they
could learn to read the Bible, let alone a book. Again, this quote aroused the
emotion of validation and made me smile because I believed it to be a great way
to start a discussion about race.
2)
Describe several issues considered to be
‘truths’ in feudal times and in the 1970s that are now understood to be false.
Explore possible ‘truths’ today that you predict will be demonstrated to be
false in the future.
During “feudal” times, blacks were considered lazy and
therefore needed to be whipped in order to work, they were also seen to be very
athletic, referring to black men as bucks. Today, Barak Obama shatters these
stereotypes and proves that black leaders as not only smart and astute, but
also disciplined and effective. Today many people think that the recipients of
welfare and affirmative action are predominately people of color, however this
will false truth will be corrected in the future.
3)
What are social and economic power? Who held
power in feudal Europe, and how did they hold on to that power? Who holds power
in the United States today, and how do those in power hold on to that power?
What is meant by the terms norm and normative? What has been a common
relationship between whiteness and these terms? How might this relate to power?
Social power is the ability to be free in society. It is
also mobility; the ability to go where you want when you want without being
harassed by police or public officials. Social power is also access, whether it
be good schools or social groups like the Boy Scouts. Economic power relates to
wealth. Certain groups, organizations, corporations can do what they want (hire
undocumented citizens) without legal repercussion because they are too big to
fail. Land developers can rebuild a community and rent at a higher price
because white people can afford it, whereas people of color, for the most part,
do not fit into that economic bracket. Economic power is the ability to control
people with the use of money. Today the NRA holds a great amount of power, and
the way they hold on to that power is by lobbying to politicians. For contracts
and gun laws, groups like the NRA will donate millions of dollars to
politicians so they cannot only get paid for signing legislation but also use
the money to fund upcoming campaigns. The norm is the status quo, such as a
criminal profile of the young black male ages 18-32 wearing a dark hoodie.
Normative refers to behavior, such as arrest or (self-defense). Whiteness is
seen as a source of power and innocence with relation to these terms.
It means that whiteness isn’t an aspect of their
consciousness. Whiteness is not something that is felt like hunger, sadness,
cold weather, or joy, but rather something that is external and brought up, as
a concept, in the presence of “others” (people of color). Whiteness is like the
status quo, where everyone in the club know what the deal is without evening
having to say anything about it. George Bush, in an introduction at a special
occasion, welcomed the guests by saying “Hello to the haves and the have
mores”. Whiteness has become synonymous with America as apple pie, both the
movie and the dessert. I am aware of
whiteness every time I turn on the tv, read a magazine, or go out in public.
Whiteness therefore is a social construct that some people have to deal with on
a day-to-day basis while others never have to bother unless they wander out of
their comfort zone and actually interact with a person of color.
Cultural materialism is the means by which people are put
into categories. Social groups come up with customs, traditions, communities,
neighborhoods, and lifestyles that are particular to their group. These social
groups are exactly that, social groups, there is no proven biological
explanation between the difference between someone who is black and someone who
is Irish. However because of cultural materialism we know why South Boston is
home to the Irish and Mattapan is home to black people. A custom for South
Boston might be the St. Patrick’s Day parade, while in Mattapan the big
celebration is the West Indian Carnival. These cultural differences have
material modes of distinction. And they play out in daily interactions between
the different groups. Historically white people have discriminated against
people of color and therefore this becomes part of the current narrative. Years
and years of social, economic, and political control has positioned white
people in a place of dominance and has lead to their privilege and access to
societal hegemony.
In-groups are exclusive and beneficial while out-groups are
inclusive and detrimental. Some examples of in-groups would include, the
brotherhood of Free Masons or the Ku Klux Klan, while an out-group would be
African American males ages 18-34 living in any urban center across the United
States.
As far as race is concerned, no, as an African American male
I have not felt especially privileged, even with respect to “affirmative
action” where the costs many times outweighed the benefits. However because of
the value my parents have placed on education I have felt privileged in terms
of having access to a plethora of educational materials at a very young age.
My thoughts on racism before reading this chapter matched
those thoughts represented in the book. With regard to both institutional
racism and interpersonal racism, Patricia Hill Collin’s book Another Kind of Public Education served
as a great resource for me in outlining the many forms in which racism takes on
and how these forms interact with one another.
Having an African American president has expanded the realms
of possibility for people of color in such a way that it has empowered a whole
generation of hopeful, optimistic, and confident American citizens. Our
understandings on race unfortunately haven’t caught up with this extraordinary
institutional change in our political history however there is hope, and a
foundation is being created to help forge into a new civil rights movement. A
movement that will include strong anti-racist agendas and institutional changes
with recognition of a long overlooked populace in this country. The reason why
we have not collectively changed our understanding on race, in spite of the
election of our first African American president, may lie in the history of
racial change in this country. We all know that Brown v. Board of Education was
settled in 1954, however we were well into the late 1980s when communities in
Boston were still having problems integrating public schools. Change therefore,
not happening in some communities, such as Boston, for over 30 years. Hopefully
we will not have to wait until 2038 to reap the benefits of having the first
African American elected president, but our history may have a say as to why
racial change in this country is not instantaneous.
Ideology is a belief system and a set of principles that a
group of individuals follow for the betterment for all those in the group.
Ideology has a great influence over how issues of race are shaped. Today many
people who listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch Bill O’Riley on tv are influenced
by the ideology of these two individuals. As more often than not, American
citizens who listen to these two men quote what they have to say during lunch
breaks or after hour sessions at the bar. And this ideology is then handed down
to children when American workers go home and talk to their sons and daughters
about public affairs. And these children then go to school with these thoughts
and express these ideas during discussions in civics class and from these
beliefs create a school culture of either tolerance or bigotry. What is
probably scary about this whole process is that individuals are not conscious
of this influence and see everything as fact. People have a hard time
contextualizing information and identifying certain political leanings that
come with monetary benefits. Sometimes the news isn’t designed to keep you
informed and aware of all perspectives but rather conceived for economic
benefit and to get ratings. What we need to do more of is consider where are news
is coming from, and whether we need to include other voices for the sake of
de-monopolizing the conversation.
Chapter 2
Race is not a biological category because there are common
properties among human beings across different races. Everyone has a heart,
eyes, lungs, blood, etc. for the most part. Those who lack one or more of these
vital organs are anomalies or the result of growing up in a certain
environment. It seems that being a human being is the common denominator before
categories such as race are manifested. Humanity is the root and race is the
branch. I have a family member who has sickle cell anemia, which is known as an
African disease. Our ancestors are from Africa, and in Africa sickle cell
anemia acts as an immunization against malaria. Meaning that those who have the
disease demonstrate a need to protect themselves in their immediate
environment, one in which malaria runs rampant. The environment rather than
genes therefore explains differences among human beings. Blacks will develop
characteristics that will enable them to survive as in the same way whites will
develop their pertinent characteristics in order to survive.
Franz Boas believed that because people of color,
historically, had different shaped skulls they were more inept and not as
developed neurologically. He was German and very racist in his ideas. He also
believed that race was biological. Some say he coined the nature/analysis of
foundational psychology.
Nature represents the roots, the origin, and the genetic makeup
that leads us up to today. It involves family trees, oral history, artifacts
and the like. Whereas nurture is the branch. How the fruit came from the seed
is just as important as how tasty the fruit is. How the tree was taken care of,
how well it was watered and attended to are aspects of nurture. Naturally when
one thinks of nurturing they think of childhood and how parents take care or
nurture their children. If one were to superimpose this concept of nature one
could make connections of nurture to how well a child is taught at school and
whether that child has access to enriching activities and hobbies that will
produce a wholesome young man or woman. Again a focus on the fruit rather than
the root is the emphasis here with nurture. With nature different racial groups
are compared and contrasted based upon great historical figures. For example,
in many educational institutions great ancient civilizations such as the Greek
and Roman empire are emphasized and connections are drawn to our present day political
system. In addition to notions of democracy the white race is also tied into
the greatness of Greek and Roman empires. Whereas, the lack of an academic
canon and artifacts concerning African civilizations, leaves those seeking a
great historical past vulnerable to ridicule and harassment. Many people
therefore make assumptions about the nature of black history, and draw
conclusions based upon how little may be found. These assumptions, more often
than not, are negative and are used to explain the origins of modern day racist
social stereotypes. Nurture deals with the trope of broken black families and
fatherless children. Many racists claim that people of color are in the boat
that they are in because parents don’t know how to take care of their kids. And
these thoughts are not only held by racist whites, but also by black people as
well. Data such as incarceration rates, infant mortality, high school drop
outs, unwed mothers, teen mothers, unemployment rates, median income among
others are tied into these racist notions found in a nature and nurture
analysis and are used too commonly by academics, political officials, law
enforcement, scientists, educators, among others to explain the racial problem
that exists on this planet.
Morton believed that only whites were fully human. Gould
believed that the population from which Morton was making his scientific
conclusions was not diverse and purposefully slanted to affirm his initial
thoughts about race. Gould exposed Morton’s bias by comparing skull size and
brain size of animals and applying the same logic, that the bigger the skull,
the bigger the brain, and the bigger the brain the more smarter the individual
or animal. Gould basically turned Morton’s ideas on their head and exposed the
inconsistency.
“Lewontin sought to study genetic variation in humans.
Specifically, he wanted to compare variation between human groups to variation
within groups.” (29) “The concept of racial classification suggests that
observed physical differences within and across groups of humans suggest a
continuum of distinctions, rather than clear and separate groups.” (30)
Lewontin’s work concludes: “It is clear that our perception of relatively large
differences between human races and subgroups, as compared to the variation
within these groups, is indeed a biased perception and that….. human races and
populations are remarkably similar to each other, with the largest part by far
of human variation being accounted for by the differences between individuals.”
(31)
Race has been claimed to be biological and that people of
color are closer to being primates than people whom are white. Evolution is and
has been used to explain the success of different racial groups in society. And
this success is based upon neurological developments. White people are argued
to have a more developed mind. “The eugenics movement was founded and supported
by white elites and by scientists and scientific research.” (36) These
scientists and elites used eugenics to explain social inequality. “Francis
Galton, cousin of Charles Darwin, invented the term eugenics in his 1883 book, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its
Development.” (36) In 1905 psychologist Alfred Binet came up with the
Intelligent Quotient (IQ). The goals of the movement was to preserve the
superior race and quarantine “imbeciles, the feeble minded, and morons”, this
was most clearly taken on by Hitler and the practices of gas chambers during
the Holocaust. “in The Bell Curve”,
Harvard University psychologists Richard J. Herrnstein and well-known
conservative thinker and political scientist Charles Murray argued in 1994 that
intelligence is something we are born with (or without); it can be as measured
through intelligence tests like Binet’s….” (48). Some social policies that this
movement promoted includes tracking in public schools as well as social
stereotypes in the form of racial profiling (lynchings for example).
“A correlation is a relationship between one dimension of
interest (one variable) and a second dimension of interest (a second variable)
that allows us to make predictions.” (42) One variable may be intelligence and
a second variable may be race. Causation would lead us to believe that those
who have low intelligence are those whom are not white, and because you are not
white you will have a low intelligence. Correlation in this instance does not
reveal causation, however eugenics would like to prove otherwise. Because we
have studies on the same topics by different scientists (Franz Boas, Morton,
Lewontin, Gould, Binet, and Charles Murray) with different conclusions about
race and intelligence for example, we do not have a strong enough foundation
for causation from correlational research.
Race can be thought of as a product of cultural materialism
and that the environment or habitat that a group of people live in brings about
differences. A people living in a warm habitat will develop different
characteristics than a people living in a cold climate. Gravlee applies this
mode of thinking to a case study on Sickle Cell Anemia. Those who have the
disease are naturally immune to malaria which is highly prevalent in many
African cultures. So Gravlee can argue that the reason why black people are
more prone to have the disease, which is hereditary and genetic, is that the
disease helps them survive in their distinct, mosquito affected, habitat.
9)
The website for the Public Broadcasting
Corporation’s (PBS’S) Race: The Power of an Illusion includes a number of
activities that challenge the concept of human races as biological. The website
can be found at www.pbs.org/race/002_SortingPeople/002_00-home.htm.
After doing the activity, reflect on the extent to which the activity confirmed
or disconfirmed the arguments and evidence in this chapter.
I did the sorting activity and I believe that it confirms
the notion that correlation doesn’t reveal causation, even though skin color
and gender were obvious attributes of the sample of individuals it was still
tough trying to distinguish their race.
10)
Read American
Anthropological Association Statement on “Race” www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm
Respond to the way the statement (a) describes research such as that of
Lewontin, (b) explains the ambiguity of racial groups, (c) describes the role
of inequality in attempts to understand race as biological, and (d) notes the
roles of nature and nurture in descriptions of differences among human groups.
The statement agrees with Lewontin and claims that races are
not clearly demarcated and that there is greater variation within racial groups
rather than among racial groups. In regards to ambiguity the statement claims
“Physical variations in any given trait tend to occur gradually rather than
abruptly over geographic areas. And because physical traits are inherited
independently of one another, knowing the range of one trait does not predict
the presence of others.” With the description of inequality the statement
claims that race “subsumed a growing ideology of inequality devised to
rationalize European attitudes and treatment of the conquered and enslaved
peoples.” With the roles of nature and nurture the statement claims that no
human is born with a built-in culture or language and that nurture in the form of
early childhood learning and behavior attests to the reality of our cultures in
forming who we are.
1.
How do we become/get/be a race? And how can one
race change into another?
We become a race by socialization. Our environment leads
people to classify other people based on skin color, hair texture, and diet,
among other things. What we see on tv, hear on the radio, or read in the
newspaper becomes part of our social truth, and we extend these stereotypes or
caricatures onto the “other” without dispute. We don’t engage in dialogue and
question some of these stereotypes possibly based on fear, and this leads to
arrogance and misinformation. And in the
worst case scenario we allow violence to settle problems that could easily be
resolved through thoughtful deliberation and dialogue.
Individuals are motivated to pass because it benefits them
and they don’t have to engage in the uncomfortable dialogue that is often times
associated with race. Ignorance or silence is often times bliss. By passing
people don’t have to think about the negative associations that are attributed
to their race. The stigma of being the other is avoided and they can assimilate
into the notion of being white or being human. The notion of self and the other
is well illustrated in the psychological philosophy of Frantz Fanon, exploring
the cultivation of identity and racial history of socialization. Rachel
Dolezal, head of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP, changed her hair color,
texture, and skin color in order to be black and possibly more accepted among
her colleagues in the NAACP. This was
intentional and goal driven as she didn’t want to explain herself as being a
white girl down for the black cause. Michael Jackson underwent heavy plastic
surgery and skin discoloration to look white possibly to be more accepted,
(though not necessary), among his fans. Again this was intentional passing.
Mariah Carey has been claimed to be white among her fans but has not undergone
any plastic surgery nor engaged in any dialogue about her racial history to
affirm nor deny the accusations. This is an example of unintentionally passing.
Tiger Woods could also be added to the conversation and Dave Chappell ‘s skit
on racial Olympics provides a humorous analysis of racial distinctions among
well- known celebrities. I perceive these forms of passing relatively similar
because they stem from anxiety about talking about race and hesitation from
embracing the beautiful aspects associated with their particular race.
One drop of black blood made a person black because the
white race was seen to be pure and any “miscegenation” tainted the pureness of
whiteness. The reverse didn’t work because the black race was not seen as pure,
as well as not originating from pro black greatness.
Any one can decide one’s race but I think the power of self
definition is most important. On national censuses people are asked to identify
their own race. And in the case with Rachel Dolezal people have the ability to
claim themselves to be any one they want. The problem lies with how natural
this identification comes. Did the person undergo extensive surgery, cosmetic
and other wise? These types of questions play a role in the distinction of
one’s “natural” race. An African person has historical ties to Africa and their
familial history could possible have origins in the antebellum south. I would
exclude from this narrative those with fair pigmentation, straight hair, and
blue eyes, as a I understand that this may feed into Aryan ideology of the
white race as well as beliefs from the Nation of Islam about the creation of
the white race. Jane Lazzare, because she has black sons, does not make her a
person of color. Again, if a person passes and lives as white, this does not
change their historical family background, and their black ancestors will not
disappear simply because they want to live a “white” lifestyle.
5. Is it ever okay to ask someone about his or her racial/ethnic background? Is it okay to be curious about people, about their culture and heritage? Conversely, is not asking or discouraging curiosity similar to doing nothing when it comes to racism? Does asking about someone’s racial/ethnic background perpetuate racism? If one is curious about another person’s race or ethnicity, what might be a socially sensitive way to inquire?
I don’t see the harm in it, as long as it comes with a
purpose, hopefully to make a connection. What may not work is stating “Oh you are
black, I have a black friend do you know him/her?” Whereas stating, “Oh your
black, does being here make you uncomfortable?” Especially in a racially
hostile environment, this second approach may be helpful. However it all
depends on the context and the intent. If the intent is to segregate then this
may be problematic. If the intent is to include then this may seem more
productive. It is ok to be curious about people, their culture, and their
heritage but it is also important to be open-minded and to throw all
preconceived notions out the door. Being color-blind is not the answer as well
because it avoids talking about sensitive racial issues that effect people on a
day-to-day basis. Saying something like I don’t see color, everyone is a human
being, may be harmful because it overlooks histories of discrimination such as
slavery or Native American genocide. Being
cognizant of racial difference as well as being open minded seems like the best
approach when engaging in issues of race.
For the person in the spotlight who is being asked to
“prove” her identity any response in which she wishes to responds is up to her.
There are no social rules as to how best to respond to racism, and in fact it
seems ridiculous to succumb to the same racial social system that breeds this
ignorance and smile like no harm has been done. Any response outside of
violence seems reasonable.
The notion of race is constructed by members of society, on
a micro level, such as a University, students come up with ways to identify
people of color. For example, some Universities use the acronym AHANA to
identify a common bond against a common oppressor. It is built on an
Afro-centric perspective of history, one in which combats the typical Eurocentric
narratives such as the Roman and Greek Empires. Ideology is connected to words
and phrases and again, people, through dialogue help clarify and solidify what
race is.
Yes I have attended an event celebrating multiculturalism
and yes it addressed issues of social power. Events that do not address social
power have to make it a focus and objective. The need to have more events that
address social power should not be entirely the responsibility of cultural
groups. These groups have no control over what enters the mainstream and
therefore should not bear the load of not having enough events. Radio stations,
tv shows, social media outlets also have to address these issues and therefore
must seek out groups and people who have different points of view. PBS and NPR
are good examples at achieving this purpose. The effects of these events or there
lack thereof have profound effects in a multitude of communities. Communities
that embrace these types of events are more willing to engage in dialogue
rather than violence in order to resolve societal issues like racism,
homophobia, and sexism. Communities that do not embrace these types of events
are more susceptible to riotous behavior among their inhabitants. The best way
to avoid these pitfalls is to be proactive rather than responsive.
While overseas in Antigua people there thought I was from
the area because I had dreadlocks at the time. In high school some one actually
called me “Fakin’ Jamaican” because of my locks and my Nigerian ancestry.
Understanding passing is important because it allows one to understand the
assumptions one can make based upon physical appearance. If I were to organize
an event that was mixed with regard to race, ethnicity, class, gender,
sexuality, and disability I would let people know that all types of people are welcomed and that it was important to embrace
their difference rather than claiming to be color blind, which is nearly
impossible.
The social construction of race of flexible and ever
changing as it involves the way society views race, gender, class, sexuality,
etc. These views change over time as oppose to the eugenic perspective on race,
which is largely based on historical findings of Darwin and other social
scientist, who argue that races are organized along lines of intelligence. The
flexibility that comes with social construction is not found in the notions of
eugenics and explains how we as a people need to part with ancient findings on
race and embrace more inclusive modes of thought.
If I were to design a multicultural event for my school or
organization I would avoid the superficial ideas about multiculturalism and
attack the problems of racism, sexism, homophobia, and power head on without
sugar coating any of the ugliness that comes with talking about race. I would
also emphasize the importance of diplomacy and the need to have conversations
rather than physical altercations in helping to heal the racial divides that
exist in this country.
Chapter 4
1.
As you read more, what ways, do you imagine, we
can address the problems described in this book?
I think the best way to address problems of ignorance with
regard to race is to actively engage in dialogue about the reality of current
race relations. To continuously doubt the frequent occurrence of police
brutality and racial profiling is to invalidate the narratives from those who
experience it. When one is not acknowledged and their reality is not
legitimized there is tension. This tension often times results in violence and
proves the immediate need to reconcile racial difference. We can address these
problems by recognizing the urgency to make social and political changes in our
communities. i.e. taking down the confederate flag in North Carolina. Or adding
community advisory boards in places such as Ferguson, Missouri.
2.
To explore how different countries, including
the United States, have asked census questions about race, visit the American
Anthropological Association’s online project entitled “Race: Are We So
Different?” at https://www.understandingrace.org/home.html.
Within the activities available under the menu Lived Experience, you can choose
the Global Census option to see how race is classified in Australia, Brazil,
Bulgaria, South Africa, and other countries. Which of these ways of classifying
race surprised you the most? Which seemed most foreign to how you have
understood race? Did you approve of any of these ways of classifying race or
ethnicity? Please do explain why or why not.
I am somewhat familiar with the racial stratification in
Brazil and how Afro Brazilians are treated differently from descendants of
Portugal, or “white” Brazilians. It doesn’t surprise me that there is this
racial divide because Brazil specifically has undergone colonialism and
political systems in which race has delineated those whom were enslaved and
those whom are free. This painful history still has remnants in contemporary
Brazilian society which makes it that much more important to eradicate racism.
Aborigines in Australia were native to the land, similar to
the way in which Native Americans were native to the land in what we now call
the United States of America. Political decrees allowed Europeans, specifically
Brits, to initiate genocide on Aborigines. And it is because of these decrees
that Aborigines as a group have not enjoyed the fruits of collective political
bargaining. Aborigines are not afforded the same citizenship rights as the
Brits and as a result face a plethora of social problems.
I believe that it is the decision of Ron Nerio to confirm or
deny his latino ancestry or culture. He grew up in a Mexican American community
and partook in Mexican American customs and traditions. He ate Mexican food
growing up and was surrounded by other Mexican Americans. However his parents
were white. So biologically or hereditary he can claim to be white. Nerio may
have been socialized as Mexican American, as he was identified as such on
school demographic reports but he has “white” blood running through his veins.
Again, I believe it is up to Nerio to decide what race he belongs to.
In 2015 many people claim to be bi-racial, even famous
celebrities like Tiger Woods, or political figures such as President Barak
Obama recognize their dual ancestry. And it is this bi-racial category that
allows us to expand our understanding of race and genetics. People are products
of a mother and father and these parents, in today’s age, experience
interracial encounters at a rate like no other in the past. From college
campuses to pervasive urban settings different races are intermingling and
people are making babies. These children are part of a new generation where
racial lines are often time blurred. Nerio and his sisters have the opportunity
to not only recognize their multilayered racial history but also their feelings
about racial belonging and the complexity of their current racial identity.
From my previous remarks I believe that race is a social
construct and exists in the minds and hearts of the current moment. With that
said, race, identity, and social constructs can change over time. What we are
experiencing in the current moment are opportunities for people to really
contemplate their racial influences and make a conscious decision as to what or
who they identify with. And it goes past race, Bruce Jenner is now Cait Jenner
and an “accepted” transgender individual who has undergone public gender
transformation with little criticism or social discrimination. He has an
opportunity to identify with being a woman and it is, for the most part,
accepted in mainstream culture. This phenomenon would not be appearent 50 years
ago, but with time we have changed our attitudes with respect to gender and
sexual orientation. Race can be chosen because we are now coming to terms with
racial history and consider not only the “root” of one’s identity but also the
“route” of racial formation.
7.
If Nerio allows others to assume his racial
background is white, is he passing? Please refer to arguments and evidence from
chapters 3 and 4 in your response.
No I don’t believe he is passing, however he may do damage
to his childhood friends and Mexican American community from which he came, if
he were to deny that part of his personal identity.
I would agree and add that notions of race lie along
structures of power and social control. Politically it is in the best interest
of whites to preserve white privilege so that their power, control, and
position of dominance goes unquestioned and uncontested. To let go of such an
apparatus means to enter real democracy and true free market capitalism.
White people might want to protect this position of power
because they don’t want to work hard or come in contact with people whom are
different from them.
No I don’t believe that penalizing crack cocaine more so
than powder cocaine is right, but I do recognize the attempt to indulge a
prison industrial complex with respect to people of color who abuse drugs. By
penalizing one over another, the criminal justice system can unjustly send a
disproportionate black population to jail and forever disenfranchise them by
denying them voting rights, education, jobs, and health care. This aspect of
the war on drugs has a ripple effect on the black community and effects people
far more greatly than having them serve time.
Chapter 5
I would consider myself part of the working class. I do not
have a trust fund, own a home, or can afford to go on “vacation”. I am college
educated and employed but I believe to be underpaid for all of my
qualifications.
Things that are classy:
-
Golfing
-
Summer house
-
Pedicure/Manicure
-
Law suits
All of these things are related to race and are behaviors,
sports, hobbies, enjoyed by Caucasians.
Whiteness is usually connected to success, and the notion of
white trash throws a wrench in this stereotypical image. White trash is a
misnomer for white lower class. Those whom are on welfare, social security, or
live in rural areas of the country are usually considered white trash. Many
people assume that all blacks are poor and this highly untrue. It also
amplifies the belief that people of color are unable to accrue wealth and climb
the corporate ladder to success. There are societal problems that affect a race
of people but those same races of people are not all prone to those same
societal problems. Success is possible it is just harder for some groups of
folks than for others, and this is based on how this country has dealt with the
race since the days of Christopher Columbus.
Yes they sure can, such as the utterance of the n-word. It
may not seem to be harmful to the white person who says it, but in fact is very
hurtful to the black person whom hears it, and reminds them of a dark sorrowful
past that is filled with pain and anger.
Everything is relative. Even if folks are making more money
than they were before does not mean things are getting more inexpensive. It is
still very hard to fund college tuition for many graduating seniors. The very
few banks that do give out loans do so at such high interest rates that it harks
to sharecropping. It is also difficult to secure a house, finance a college
education, and keep the fridge full and the car full of gas all at the same
time. Black folks are just beginning to, as a group, enjoy the wealth of the
superpower we call the United States of America.
Income is how much a NFL player makes in his 10 year
contract. Wealth is how much the Rockefeller family is worth in stocks, bonds,
and equity. Millions in the former to billions in the latter.
It is like there is this big track meet. And with all the
inheritance that white people have there is a staggered start and a delay. The
gun shoots off but one group is not allowed to run yet, because they are not
ready yet. They can’t afford to spend all of that energy. And then in the
middle of the race there is another gun that goes off and black folks are
expected to “catch up”. Inheritance gives those white people the head start,
and it seems almost impossible to catch up. The Federal Housing Authority
(FHA), is more willing to help those whom are white than those whom are of
color, and their loans are based on the amount of “wealth” a person has.
Wealth has created legacies at colleges that secures white
dominance in certain industrial domains.
Chapter 6
1.
Compare and contrast having a critical
conversation about race with having a racist conversation. What aspects of the
conversation will cause these to be distinct from each other? Could a critical
conversation about race ever be racist?
A critical conversation about race is about giving voice to
a narrative that has been suppressed and silenced. It is also about racial
harmony and building a bridge between the unknowns, so that we can ameliorate
racial misunderstanding and create peace and harmony. A racist conversation is
about solidifying stereotypes and about maintaining blindness to certain
narratives. Nothing comes out of racist conversations except anger, confusion,
frustration, and turmoil. A critical conversation about race can turn in a racist
conversation and that is usually when one feels offended and finds it necessary
to lash out and say something inflammatory.
I think it is important for families to understand that when
they send their children to schools that are diverse their children are more
likely to learn new things and be exposed to a culture that is ever searching
for truth and justice. Such an environment is robust and requires the said student
to always actively participate in dialogue and conversation about real life
issues. Segregation may occur at first but more often than not, there is an
exchange of ideas and cultures when students begin to feel more comfortable.
Historically black fraternities and sororities were designed
to support students who felt isolated in the midst of whiteness on college
campuses. And for that reason I see why they were important and still exist for
that very same reason. Even though things have gotten better, these groups
still provide students with a network that is essential in professional
development in and out of school. From what I gather, certain white
fraternities and sororities were designed to keep people of color out of their
groups and deny them academic and professional opportunities, such as interview
to successful firms. For that reason I would have to deny their importance on
college campuses. No group should exist to exclude people based on race. It may
seem like a double standard, but one has to consider context and the overall
goals of such groups.
Conversations in all white settings, all black settings, all
people of color settings, and intermingled settings are all and equally
important. One should not be silent in the midst of injustice no matter what
the environment. The level of engagement may be different given the audience
and circumstance but all people should always be focused on racial justice.
Educators might have students read a list of diverse authors and have them
compare and contrast ideologies, getting a sense of historical forms of
resistance to racial discrimination. The benefits of conversations within
exclusive racial groups is that there may seem a sense of belonging and the
need for collective action within the group. The problem within exclusive
groups is that there may be a sense of complacency, while the urgency to
rectify problems fizzle out.
The new tv show fresh off the boat, about an Asian family
assimilating into America is a good example of some of the stereotypes found in
mass media. Historically Asians have been played by white people when it came
to movies, tv shows, or Hollywood. There was also the explosion of minstrelsy
starting in the late 19th century that included white people acting
in black face. The technique used in both examples is exclusion. Not just on
the acting side, but also in the creation of entertainment. People of color are
denied the creative rights to tell their own stories and as a result,
stereotypes are magnified and reflect the true misunderstanding of race by
mainstream media.
I think the teaching of the hidden curriculum would be
liberating for students who subscribe to the varying ideologies. I think it
would be very valuable to both white people and people of color more generally.
I also think it will motivate students to take initiatives by putting on events
and engaging in dialogue. The only resistance that I see may come from status
quo students who dislike changes to the student body and the curriculum as a
whole. Another name for this group might possibly be college republicans.
I would advise that teacher to join with other faculty
members and students to voice their concerns to the administration and reach
out to other universities as well as media to put pressure on those whom are in
position of power. The teacher that does have the courage to include critical
examinations on race will win over students who are not only curious but also
loyal, which is beneficial in the long run, as that teacher will gain strength
in the presence of his/her allies.
The case of Eric Garner being strangled to death in New York
is evidence of the concept of stereotype threat. Black males are thought to be
violent and dangerous and as a result are met with a substantial amount of
hostility from police. A teacher can illustrate the many ways in which the
public creates stereotypes for people of color. Once students understand that
these stereotypes exist and become aware of their origins they then are able to
identify and dismantle the structure in which supports institutional racism. On
a scholarly level, students can trace the history of racism and bring to the
surface the many ways in which people of color have resisted these modes of
thought. With knowledge comes power, and the more truth a teacher can bestow
upon his or her student the better that student becomes equipped to fight
racism in the future.
9.
How does race relate to socioeconomic class and
funding in public schools? What might be the long-term effects of discrepant
funding?
People of color predominately live in low-income areas. And these
areas generate a minimal amount of revenue in property taxes. It is these taxes
that help fund public education. If there is little money to work with in the
beginning then the harder it becomes to invest for the future. Money for
quality teachers, sports and arts programs, and technology for students is
tight and the likelihood of success in such a community is minimized. Education
is not valued as a viable option for future success. Young people emulate drug
dealers or gangsters in the community and the pipeline to the criminal justice
system is paved with these frustrations with public education. The long term
effects of this discrepant funding are daunting with respect to prosperity and
community wealth. Too few people will go to college, secure housing, and
steadily contribute to growth in the public education system. The case is
urgent, complex, but surmountable enough to be overthrown.
I would agree that education is the key to addressing bias
and privilege. The sort of education that this would require can be summed up
in the work of Patricia Hill Collins and her work, Another Kind of Public
Education. In the work Collins talks about counter-surveilance and the
necessity of critical thinking. This can be achieved through extensive teacher
education programs that emphasize social justice and critical race theory. It
also requires access, through public libraries and the such, to 21st
Century technology. With this technology students are more likely to learn 21st
Century skills and enter 21st Century jobs. Cornel West, a prolific
critical race theorist would probably agree with this statement and cite the
works of W.E.B.Dubois in affirming the importance of education among people of
color.
Chapter 7
Affluent neighborhoods are full with doctors, lawyers,
businessmen and women, dentists, architects, engineers, professors, teachers,
construction workers, among many other professions. The networks in these
communities are natural. However in order to live in such a community for some
seems impossible, even when they are next door. Through acts like redlining
affluent communities actively work towards keeping their environment free from
people of color and those in the lower classes. Therefore social mobility
becomes a joke and those whom grow up in these poor communities know that there
is little to no chance of getting out.
Another example of segregation is the transportation system
and the way in which people of color have a more difficult time (having to
endure long travels) to get to some of the same areas that take whites minutes
to get to.
Institutional racism is prejudice in the legal system and
discrepancies in the economy. One example of institutional racism is
gentrification. The rent rises so that low-income black families cannot afford.
Houses and apartments become vacant. Developers move in and make things new. And
then white people move in. With this new demographic new businesses open up,
restaurants, dental and law offices, etc. And the urban community that was once
there are uprooted and living unconnected like refugees in their own country.
As far being cumulative, this process is repeated over time and expanded to all
corners of the nation, so that once historically black communities are now
stomping grounds for hipsters and white college students. Families are
dismantled and collective action is disintegrated.
Fitting in, especially on the college campus, is about
participating in the customs of the institution, no matter how racist those
customs may seem.
A professional dress code for men is a suit, tie, button
down shirt, sweater (cardigan), shoes (no sneakers?) for women, all the same as
well as dresses, and skirts. The culture from which this code comes from is
European.
Experience is a huge issue. Employers usually ask about how
much experience one may have in the industry and if you have a hard time
getting a job in the first place, because of your name, skin color, sexual
orientation, or lack of connections, this question becomes difficult to answer.
What people of color usually need is that one break, that one opportunity, but
the assumption for employers is that opportunities are always readily
available. There is a clear misunderstanding about how hard it is for a certain
group of people to secure a well paying job, regardless of the amount of
education the person may have.
Statistical discrimination is the amount of people of color
in jail. And how this disadvantages people of color is the assumption among
employers that all people of color
have been to jail. Sometimes before CORI results come back, employers choose
their white counterparts because of the stigma associated with people of color
and jail.
Usually people of color have a higher unemployment rate than
white people. It is because of this statistic that people of color have a hard
time finding a job. Idle time is also the devil’s workshop, instead of spending
most of the day at work, people of color have a greater chance of engaging in
criminal activity. This a big reason why there is such an ardent push for after
school programs, jobs for teenagers during the summer, and outpatient services
for drug abusers. Ultimately people of color should play a bigger part in our
national economy and looked at as potential positive contributors to society.
Since the war on drugs, police officers target weed smokers
and crack-heads usually in urban communities. This has happened because the war
on drugs specifies certain quotas as a way to show the public that the
government is taking drugs off the streets. It is for PR and political reasons
more than anything that the war on drugs has been pushed into full gear.
The male breadwinner model is the belief that the father
brings home the bacon and provides the family with the funds necessary to live
a happy and healthy life. On white families this model has emphasized
paternalism and ignores the occupational desires of the wife and mother. Their
ambitions are put on the back burner as they are looked upon to take care of
the children. For families of color, there is tension because fathers have a
harder time finding a job than mothers. This model emasculates the male rather
than fortifies his skills and talents. Women are then looked upon to fill that
void, and fathers abuse drugs and/or engage in criminal activity. As a result
the baby daddy and baby mamma stereotypes are born.
Meritocracy is a myth because no matter how hard a person of
color works, they still do not have the same type of access to class mobility
than their white counterparts.
Chapter 8
At one time in history Chinese and Japanese immigrants
(Exclusion Act) were denied entrance into the United States. The federal
government was wary that these Asian immigrants would act as spies as soon as
they entered the country. The government, during WWII was so paranoid that they
set up internment camps to house these Asian immigrants whereas German
Americans, many of whom had ties to the Nazi regime, were treated like
Americans. Citizenship, since the dawn of this country, has always been a
privilege of the wealthy white elite. People of color and women were denied the
right to vote, access to education, and entrance into high level management in
large corporations. Citizenship, in large part, has had something to do with
being white, no matter if your ancestors are from European countries. The
ability to pass for these European immigrants is by far much easier than
immigrants from Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
2.
In this chapter, the possibility of implementing
an Arizona style immigration law along the Canadian border in Michigan is
briefly discussed. Why might the implementation of such a law be different in
Michigan v. Arizona?
I highly doubt that in Michigan, state troopers, or federal
agents, will be arresting “illegal” immigrants at gunpoint. Whereas in Arizona,
Mexican immigrants will have a much harder time entering the country even if
they do have the right paper work. The discrepancy in responses has a great
deal to do with race in this country and the stereotypes that are perpetuated by
mainstream media and ignorant politicians. So long as we hold on to these
racial myths we will never reach the solution for more egalitarian immigration.
Some forms of welfare assistance includes social security,
food stamps, and Medicaid. Welfare is often associated with low-income families
of color because many people believe that they are too lazy and don’t want to
work. Rather, the truth of the matter is that most people who receive welfare
assistance are white people. And many of these people believe they deserve
federal assistance.
The history of welfare legislation begins with FDR, the
depression, and GIs. The idea was that families would benefit from grants and
work assistance programs. But people of color were cut out of the equation and
were forced to live substandard lives, sometimes sleeping 3-4 people in the
same bed. I agree that white privilege was an influence, and the reason I agree
can be summed up by Patricia Hill Collins’ in her book Another Kind of
Public Education. In it she talks about her grandfather and how, as a WWII
vey, that he was denied some of the basic needs of all Americans, housing,
healthcare, and an occupation, despite the New Deal and GI legislation.
Many people believe that because of affirmative action
people of color whom are “non qualified” take positions away from white people
whom are “qualified”. But this cannot be any further from the truth. Take the
presidency for example, Barak Obama and George W. Bush. President Obama was a
college professor, editor of the Harvard Law Review, community organizer and
author of two books. George W. Bush was a C student who ran a few businesses
into bankruptcy and lost a few elections in his runs for governor. Could Barak
Obama gotten away with the same grades. I highly doubt it. The truth of the matter
is that people of color are more qualified than their white counter parts and
often times paradoxically, receive lower pay.
The gap between the working/middle class and the elite class
has grown at an alarming rate. And when it seems to be bad economically for the
mass population, members of this elite class somehow still come out on top.
Issues such as debt, or the minimum wage harms the working/middle class and
paralyzes them in a position of immobility. What needs to happen is that
systems should be put into place so that the road to the top doesn’t seem
impossible, and that a good education will lead to a prosperous and enlightened
citizenry.
The resistance to change the minimum wage comes from wealthy
business owners and the Republican party more generally. This philosophy has
rots in Reaganomics and the belief that wealth should trickle down from the
elite to the mass. The stereotype of the “welfare” mom also came out during
this time (the 80s) and people believed that irresponsible parents were using
this welfare money to buy frivolous things like jewelry or $100 sneakers. The
resistance mainly comes from racists who believe that black people cannot take
care of themselves.
The rational choice arguments in the case of wages in the
United States hasn’t worked because the government sets the minimum wage. And
the government sets the minimum wage. And the government is in large part in
tandem with Wall Street, big time executives fund political campaigns and there
are staunch proponents of keeping the status quo with respect to minimum wage.
The rational choice argument will not work until the masses (those whom work
for minimum wage) are represented in our federal government, their voices need
to be heard and legislation needs to be drawn to secure the American dream for
every citizen.
Many black people, those whom are affluent especially, do
not want to concern themselves with the stigma of affirmative action. Clarence
Thomas supreme court justice, in court proceedings, has denounced affirmative
action despite the fact that he is black and many have benefited from
affirmative action in the past. Nonetheless black people in general, do not all
agree on affirmative action and welfare. And argue that we should embrace a
meritocracy where people are judged on their achievements and not their skin
color. What one has to consider however is the minute number of opportunities
that present themselves to people of color, and the quality of education in
urban centers versus more affluent suburbs. Irish Americans similarly distanced
themselves from black people during the nineteenth century because they didn’t
want to deal with the stigma of being called lazy or non-industrious. They were
immigrants to the country and marginalized along with black folks, but instead
of collaboration and mobilizing as a members of a majority minority they chose
to separate themselves and claimed to be different and hard working. The jury
was out, and Boston Brahmins seeking for the best way to maintain their power,
believed dissension within the ranks would cause an internal conflict and
prevent any sudden uprisings and insurgency. Questions on urban decay,
unemployment, and a damaged education system, because of the fracture in group
alliances, would go unanswered for decades.
A living wage is a wage that secures housing for families
and individuals, a healthy nutritious diet, quality education, and
comprehensive health care, as well as access to transportation and money for
leisure activities such as sports and the arts.
Chapter Nine
Race is made real through collective consciousness. Groups
of people agree about what race is and how different races maintain specific
characteristics. Racial stereotypes that are evident in concrete data
surrounding college admissions and prison populations are part of the
“realness” of racial social construction. Chapter one talks about power and who
holds power, and this analysis gives birth to such ideas as white supremacy.
Chapter two goes right into the heart of race and explains the ideologies surrounding
biology and social construct, and how they act in tandem to create racial
attributes, more often demonizing one group over another. And finally in
chapter three, the book talks about racial inheritance and how social
constructs of race differ from personalized identities of race.
Black Americans are thought to be criminals, Asians are
believed to be bad drivers, Latinos are machismo and denigrate women, and White
people are racist and ignorant.
I believe that the minimum wage should be raised and
nationalized, I would support using tax dollars to establish infrastructures
throughout the United States in providing jobs for those on welfare and social
security.
With the guaranteed income movement people of color would
not be relegated to subhuman lifestyles in the United States. They would not
only be able to contribute to the wealth of America but also enjoy many of its
pleasures.
Cognitive dissonance comes from people who do not want to
take responsibility to the racial climate in this country. In order for them to
do so, they have to accept some counter-idealistic notions of how America was
built and maintained. White people do not want to believe that America
institutionally discriminates against other people because if they do, they
will have to recognize their privilege. Productive ways to seek a reduction of
cognitive dissonance would be to expand the scope of racism and to talk about
global ethnic groups and how race can be substituted with power, and how power
has been used around the world to suppress one group under another.
Classroom experiences have revealed the extent of racism and
ignorance among my classmates who have never fully engaged in the construction
of racism.
7. The jigsaw classroom is one system that can be institutionalized to focus on meeting people’s needs and caring for individuals, rather than fostering competition. In what ways is the jigsaw classroom similar to or distinct from the guaranteed income in terms of addressing needs, caring, and competition?
The jigsaw classroom helps to construct ideas with a diverse
amount of information. When people are moved to engage in dialogue about what
they know and don’t know there is the potential for growth and honest
collaboration against the perils of racism. These methods are similar to the
guaranteed income rate in so much that they validate different experience and
identities.
They might have elevated to positions of power faster than
what history has bestowed upon them.
Race has been used to designate African Americans as 3/5 of
a human being. Techniques of the jigsaw classroom is the solidify this reality
and demonstrate its ripple effects throughout history.
Yes it can. We are all human beings with the same human
needs. However we have created cultures that should be respected for their
distinction and context for survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment