When discussing education reform, No Child Left Behind is
cited as the beginning of the end of a movement towards a more democratic
public education institution. Unfortunately, regardless of the shift in
executive partisan leadership, Obama and his educational initiative Race to the
Top have been accused of continuing the standardized machine the leaves
teachers, students, and communities on the margins. Without addressing the root
cause such epidemics as the achievement gap, Race to the Top hastily favors a
start from zero approach. What is seriously wrong with this approach is the
appearance of a staggered start that eventually evens out. However as time goes
on certain runners are asked to run more laps than others, and according to the
legislation that this process still establishes a process towards democracy.
“No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, which involve
high levels of solely quantitative measures of “success”; and frequent tests
for preservice teachers that may or may not evaluate their abilities to teach
effectively.” (Porfilio xiv) These measures are not indicative of many of the
challenges students and teachers face on a day- to- day basis, due to societal
issues and lack of resources respectively. Therefore an irrelevant test is
manifested for a population who, to put it plainly, couldn’t care any less.
Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education “wishes to create a
system to measure the Value Added scores for graduates of teacher preparation
programs and reward programs that yield high- scoring teachers and punish those
who fail to make the grade.” (Duncan 2012, Porfilio 58) This may seem like a
great idea, keeping teachers accountable, however Duncan himself has never
taught in a traditional classroom, his credentials lie in school
administration, and even though this may be great preparation for formally holding
teachers accountable, it is a spit in the face of teachers who have little
representation via unions, to express their countless attempts to “improve test
scores”. If you are not in the class everyday, or have some frame of reference,
no matter how vague, of classroom culture, it is hard to determine what exactly
are suitable measures of competence in such an array of diverse class
environments. All students are intelligent, yes, so therefore the objective is
just a matter of identifying that intelligence, and nurturing it until the
student becomes able to form a healthy self-esteem and positive
self-identity.
What gets in the way of determining these intelligences are
standardized tests.
“Standardized testing is at the center of No Child Left
Behind and its blueprint for reauthorization, Race the Top, the push for value
added assessment, the creation of database tracking projects to longitudinally
measure teacher ‘performance’ on students’ standardized tests, the linkage of
teacher evaluation and pay to such standardized test-based measures, the
imposition of ‘urban portfolio districts,’ legislative moves to stifle the
power of teachers unions, the unbridled entry of corporate managers into school
reform bypassing professional educators and educational scholarship, and the
use of corporate media to frame educational problems as solutions. Standardized
testing has also been at the center of the push for charter school expansion
and the expansion of for profit management companies running schools.”
(Porfilio 75) In addition to holding teachers accountable for things they
cannot control, Race to the Top also rewards exclusive charter schools who have
little proven difference in test scores then public schools, and for the ones
that do better, they have very restrictive de facto regulations that closes the
door on ELL and special needs students. What this may be is a resurgence of
eugenic philosophies of race-based intelligence and the futile approach to
equalize an inherently unequal genetic paradigm. Race to the Top therefore
needs to be more inclusive and democratic, welcoming voices in and outside of
the traditional and unorthodox school systems.
Left Behind in the Race to the Top: Realities of School
Reform edited by Julie Gorlewski and Brad Porfilio published by Information
Age Publishing Charlotte, North Carolina 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment